http://www.agilecmmi.com/index.php/2010/03/like-a-broken-record-assume-an-engineering-mindset-2/ A starting point for a discussion on marrying Agile methods and CMMI. Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:10:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.agilecmmi.com/index.php/2010/03/like-a-broken-record-assume-an-engineering-mindset-2/comment-page-1/#comment-974 You’ve got processes, but . . . | Agile CMMI blog Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:15:53 +0000 http://www.agilecmmi.com/?p=141#comment-974 [...] Seems awfully much like the development group had and used processes.  How could they not rate better than Maturity Level 1 (ML1)?!  Setting aside the specific gaps in some practices that would have sunk their ability to demonstrate anything higher than ML1 – because this isn’t where the interesting stuff shows up, and, because even were these practices performed, they still would have rated under ML2 – what the report’s colorful depiction communicated was something far harder to address than specific gaps.  The developers’ organization was using CMMI incorrectly.  A topic I cover at least in the following posts: here and here. [...] [...] Seems awfully much like the development group had and used processes.  How could they not rate better than Maturity Level 1 (ML1)?!  Setting aside the specific gaps in some practices that would have sunk their ability to demonstrate anything higher than ML1 – because this isn’t where the interesting stuff shows up, and, because even were these practices performed, they still would have rated under ML2 – what the report’s colorful depiction communicated was something far harder to address than specific gaps.  The developers’ organization was using CMMI incorrectly.  A topic I cover at least in the following posts: here and here. [...]

]]>