<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Agile CMMI blog &#187; Constellation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.agilecmmi.com/index.php/category/constellation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.agilecmmi.com</link>
	<description>A starting point for a discussion on marrying Agile methods and CMMI.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to &quot;Get Out of CMMI&quot;&#8230; FREE! (sort of)</title>
		<link>http://www.agilecmmi.com/index.php/2008/08/how-to-get-out-of-cmmi-free-sort-of/</link>
		<comments>http://www.agilecmmi.com/index.php/2008/08/how-to-get-out-of-cmmi-free-sort-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hillel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMMI for Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constellation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services vs. Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.agilecmmi.com/index.php/2008/08/how-to-get-out-of-cmmi-free-sort-of/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
 Most people who&#8217;ve heard of CMMI are familiar with what today is actually called CMMI for Development.&#160; The current version is v1.2 and earned the &#34;for development&#34; moniker when it transitioned from v1.1 to v1.2.
Why was &#34;for development&#34; added?&#160; Because, in August 2006 when it was released, CMMI for Acquisition was already on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.agilecmmi.com%2Findex.php%2F2008%2F08%2Fhow-to-get-out-of-cmmi-free-sort-of%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.agilecmmi.com%2Findex.php%2F2008%2F08%2Fhow-to-get-out-of-cmmi-free-sort-of%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/agilecmmi/SJzpWPteX7I/AAAAAAAAACM/XhmbMs7y_fI/s1600-h/image4.png"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="126" alt="image" src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/agilecmmi/SJzpWdclcOI/AAAAAAAAACQ/xJoYowSpoc4/image_thumb2.png?imgmax=800" width="144" align="left" border="0" /></a> Most people who&#8217;ve heard of CMMI are familiar with what today is actually called CMMI for <em>Development</em>.&#160; The current version is v1.2 and earned the &quot;for development&quot; moniker when it transitioned from v1.1 to v1.2.</p>
<p>Why was &quot;for development&quot; added?&#160; Because, in August 2006 when it was released, CMMI for <em>Acquisition</em> was already on the path to being released (which happened in November 2007), and CMMI for <em>Services</em> was somewhere else in the pipeline. </p>
<p>The three, collectively, are referred-to as <a href="http://www.cmmifaq.info/#7.01" target="_blank">constellations</a>.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how I distinguish the three constellations:</p>
<blockquote><p>Development = <strong><em>Build</em></strong> stuff.       <br />(Tangible, storable products, made to spec in a life cycle.)</p>
<p>Acquisition = <strong><em>Buy</em></strong> stuff.       <br />(Specify, solicit, select contract, procure, accept, transition to consumer.)</p>
<p>Services = <strong><em>Do</em></strong> stuff.       <br />(Intangible, non-storable, products delivered via a systemic way to deliver the service.)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Service constellation will be very important for a large number of organizations because so much of what they&#8217;re doing would really be better characterized as &quot;providing a service&quot; <em>despite</em> the fact that the service they&#8217;re providing is software development.</p>
<p>Why is this important for &quot;Agile&quot; organizations?</p>
<p>Because (and this depends on several other factors), it may be possible to use CMMI for <em>Services</em> to achieve a real CMMI rating that has much less of an immediate, adverse impact on development activities than <em>might </em>be experienced <em>(when not done correctly)</em> with CMMI for Development.&#160; </p>
<p>(This is true of any development activities, agile or otherwise.)</p>
<p>Allow me to be clear, CMMI for Services is not a &quot;cop-out&quot; of CMMI for Development.&#160; Though, CMMI for Services may be <em>more appropriate</em> for some organizations than CMMI for Development (which is why <em>-Services</em> was created), and so this is an option for them, not an option for everyone.</p>
<p>So&#8230; what&#8217;s next?</p>
<p>CMMI for Services is expected to be officially launched in March 2009 at <a href="http://www.sei.cmu.edu/sepg" target="_blank">SEPG 2009</a>.&#160; <a href="http://www.cmmifaq.info/#20" target="_blank">Appraisals</a> against it will be accepted about 6 months later.</p>
<p>In the meantime, people interested in CMMI for services can start using it under controlled piloting efforts underway with the SEI.&#160; Feel free to <a href="http://www.entinex.com/contact.cfm" target="_blank">contact me</a> for more information on piloting the CMMI for Services.&#160; (I&#8217;m helping the SEI with that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.agilecmmi.com/index.php/2008/08/how-to-get-out-of-cmmi-free-sort-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
