Comments for Agile CMMI blog

Comment on Contact Hillel by Agile Development and CMMI: Incompatible or Best Friends? | Accelerance

Agile Development and CMMI: Incompatible or Best Friends? | Accelerance — Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:10:59 +0000

[...] myths out there about CMMI that we need to clarify now. In his edgy, in-your-face CMMI FAQ, Hillel Glazer of Entinex, Inc. sets out to bust one of the biggest myths: that CMMI is akin to the [...]

Comment on Planning Poker cards are here! by Juan Carlos Torres

Juan Carlos Torres — Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:16:20 +0000

Hi Hillel

The organization I work for is CMMi L3. For maintenance projects, we currently use a parametric method to estimate size, complexity and effort. We have implemented improvements to this technique, but still, there is large variability on the performance of this method (when compared against actual effort, which we record).

There are strong initiatives to move to a more agile approach, including effort estimation using planning poker, but we don´t want it to turn into a total-guessing and whole-dependable-on-persons technique

I understand that (out of the box) it covers PP, because attributes (size, complexity) are estimated, and later effort get derived from them

However I´d like your comments on maturity level 3 practices, such as Generic Pratice GP 3.2 (Collect Process Related Experiences), IPM SP 1.2 (Use Organizational Process Assets for Planning Project Activities)

Thanks for your comments
Juan Carlos

Comment on Contact Hillel by Stephen Mills

Stephen Mills — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:24:18 +0000

Excellent CMMI FAQ!!! I am very much interested in the Agile CMMI approach of your company. Your approach may be a good fit for our CMMI efforts. I hope to learn more about the concept and how your business might be able to partner with us to achieve process improvement and CMMI certification.

Comment on The Cart Before the Horse by software development india

software development india — Fri, 06 Apr 2012 21:12:40 +0000

Thank you very much for this useful information.Please keep on blogging.I am looking forward to read your next great article..

Comment on Brian Lyons: Finally resting. by Xehmer

Xehmer — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:18:35 +0000

quality post…

ugg boots in love, http://www.melisinema.com ,thanks ugg…

Comment on Like a Broken Record: Assume an Engineering Mindset by You’ve got processes, but . . . | Agile CMMI blog

You’ve got processes, but . . . | Agile CMMI blog — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:15:53 +0000

[...] Seems awfully much like the development group had and used processes. How could they not rate better than Maturity Level 1 (ML1)?! Setting aside the specific gaps in some practices that would have sunk their ability to demonstrate anything higher than ML1 – because this isn’t where the interesting stuff shows up, and, because even were these practices performed, they still would have rated under ML2 – what the report’s colorful depiction communicated was something far harder to address than specific gaps. The developers’ organization was using CMMI incorrectly. A topic I cover at least in the following posts: here and here. [...]

Comment on High Performance Operations (my book) is now available! by Another Title

Another Title — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:16:49 +0000

tv online…

http://www.tv-online-live.com...

Comment on Blaming CMMI is just another symptom … of LCPBCs by You’ve got processes, but . . . | Agile CMMI blog

You’ve got processes, but . . . | Agile CMMI blog — Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:43:26 +0000

[...] organization was using CMMI incorrectly. A topic I cover at least in the following posts: here and [...]

Comment on SEPG North America – Day 3 by Matildess

Matildess — Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:28:46 +0000

Hello…

My life,vist it http://blog.extra.by/xiangdress/ ,Thanks….

Comment on Brian Lyons: Finally resting. by Dehmer

Dehmer — Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:26:32 +0000

Great…

love your blog, http://blog.oricon.co.jp/alaina/ ,Thanks again….